Поиск уязвимостей

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption As Al reported in link[1]: f2fs_rename() ... if (old_dir != new_dir && !whiteout) f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry, old_dir_page, new_dir); else f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0); You want correct inumber in the ".." link. And cross-directory rename does move the source to new parent, even if you'd been asked to leave a whiteout in the old place. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/ With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed to call f2fs_set_link() to update ".." link to new directory. - mkdir -p dir/foo - renameat2 -w dir/foo bar [ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421) --> Bad inode number[0x4] for '..', parent parent ino is [0x3] [FSCK] other corrupted bugs [Fail]

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption As Al reported in link[1]: f2fs_rename() ... if (old_dir != new_dir && !whiteout) f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry, old_dir_page, new_dir); else f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0); You want correct inumber in the ".." link. And cross-directory rename does move the source to new parent, even if you'd been asked to leave a whiteout in the old place. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/ With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed to call f2fs_set_link() to update ".." link to new directory. - mkdir -p dir/foo - renameat2 -w dir/foo bar [ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421) --> Bad inode number[0x4] for '..', parent parent ino is [0x3] [FSCK] other corrupted bugs [Fail]

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f ...

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption As Al reported in link[1]: f2fs_rename() ... if (old_dir != new_dir && !whiteout) f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry, old_dir_page, new_dir); else f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0); You want correct inumber in the ".." link. And cross-directory rename does move the source to new parent, even if you'd been asked to leave a whiteout in the old place. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/ With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed to call f2fs_set_link() to update ".." link to new directory. - mkdir -p dir/foo - renameat2 -w dir/foo bar [ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421) --> Bad inode number[0x4] for '..', parent parent ino is [0x3] [FSCK] other corrupted bugs [Fail]

Уязвимость функции f2fs_rename() компонента f2fs ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю повысить свои привилегии

Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt

ALT-PU-2024-17576: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.209-alt2

ALT-PU-2024-18073: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.209-alt1.rt101

ALT-PU-2024-18054: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.75-alt1

ALT-PU-2024-18358: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.75-alt2

ALT-PU-2024-18254: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.1.75-alt1.rt23

ALT-PU-2024-18462: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.6.14-alt1

ALT-PU-2024-18203: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.6.14-alt1

ALT-PU-2024-1865: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 6.6.16-alt1

ALT-PU-2024-4843: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.1.77-alt1

ALT-PU-2024-4263: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.1.77-alt1