Количество 21
Количество 21

CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca...

CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca...

CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca

CVE-2024-26935
CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ...
GHSA-hxgr-6xc2-q9mv
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was all...

BDU:2024-09394
Уязвимость компонента scsi ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальной информации

RLSA-2025:1068
Moderate: kernel security update
ELSA-2025-1068
ELSA-2025-1068: kernel security update (MODERATE)

ROS-20241031-01
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt

RLSA-2024:8617
Moderate: kernel security update
ELSA-2024-8617
ELSA-2024-8617: kernel security update (MODERATE)

SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2894-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2203-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2135-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2939-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2019-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2190-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:2008-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca... | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
![]() | CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад |
![]() | CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
![]() | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | ||
CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ... | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | ||
GHSA-hxgr-6xc2-q9mv In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was all... | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | ||
![]() | BDU:2024-09394 Уязвимость компонента scsi ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальной информации | CVSS3: 3.3 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад |
![]() | RLSA-2025:1068 Moderate: kernel security update | 4 месяца назад | ||
ELSA-2025-1068 ELSA-2025-1068: kernel security update (MODERATE) | 4 месяца назад | |||
![]() | ROS-20241031-01 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 8.8 | 8 месяцев назад | |
![]() | RLSA-2024:8617 Moderate: kernel security update | 7 месяцев назад | ||
ELSA-2024-8617 ELSA-2024-8617: kernel security update (MODERATE) | 8 месяцев назад | |||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 10 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2894-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 10 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2203-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 12 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2135-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 12 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2939-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 10 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2019-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2190-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 12 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:2008-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу