Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 34
Количество 34
CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca...
CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca...
CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca
CVE-2024-26935
CVE-2024-26935
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ...
GHSA-hxgr-6xc2-q9mv
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was all...
BDU:2024-09394
Уязвимость компонента scsi ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальной информации
RLSA-2025:1068
Moderate: kernel security update
ELSA-2025-1068
ELSA-2025-1068: kernel security update (MODERATE)
RLSA-2024:8617
Moderate: kernel security update
ELSA-2024-8617
ELSA-2024-8617: kernel security update (MODERATE)
ROS-20241031-01
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt
ALT-PU-2024-18366
ALT-PU-2024-18366: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.84-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-18059
ALT-PU-2024-18059: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.84-alt1
SUSE-SU-2026:0473-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2024-18470
ALT-PU-2024-18470: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.6.24-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-18142
ALT-PU-2024-18142: package `kernel-image-6.8` update to version 6.8.3-alt1
SUSE-SU-2025:02537-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:02264-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2024-18077
ALT-PU-2024-18077: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.215-alt1.rt107
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was alloca | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
0% Низкий | около 2 лет назад | |||
CVE-2024-26935 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
GHSA-hxgr-6xc2-q9mv In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was all... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
BDU:2024-09394 Уязвимость компонента scsi ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальной информации | CVSS3: 3.3 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
RLSA-2025:1068 Moderate: kernel security update | больше 1 года назад | |||
ELSA-2025-1068 ELSA-2025-1068: kernel security update (MODERATE) | почти 2 года назад | |||
RLSA-2024:8617 Moderate: kernel security update | около 2 лет назад | |||
ELSA-2024-8617 ELSA-2024-8617: kernel security update (MODERATE) | около 2 лет назад | |||
ROS-20241031-01 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 8.8 | около 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-18366 ALT-PU-2024-18366: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.84-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-18059 ALT-PU-2024-18059: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.84-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2026:0473-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 9 месяцев назад | |||
ALT-PU-2024-18470 ALT-PU-2024-18470: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.6.24-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-18142 ALT-PU-2024-18142: package `kernel-image-6.8` update to version 6.8.3-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.8 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2025:02537-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:02264-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | больше 1 года назад | |||
ALT-PU-2024-18077 ALT-PU-2024-18077: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.215-alt1.rt107 | CVSS3: 9.1 | больше 2 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу