Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 29
Количество 29
CVE-2025-38721
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) { if (ct != last) nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); But this referen...
CVE-2025-38721
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) { if (ct != last) nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); But this referen...
CVE-2025-38721
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) {
CVE-2025-38721
netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump
CVE-2025-38721
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ...
GHSA-6237-rh4h-82p6
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) ...
BDU:2025-15750
Уязвимость компонента nf_conntrack_netlink.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ROS-20260407-80-0016
Уязвимость kernel-lt
ROS-20260407-73-0015
Уязвимость kernel-lt
SUSE-SU-2025:3725-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03601-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ELSA-2025-20662
ELSA-2025-20662: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2025-25757
ELSA-2025-25757: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2025-20663
ELSA-2025-20663: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
SUSE-SU-2025:03602-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2025:03633-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2025-16619
ALT-PU-2025-16619: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.241-alt1.rt135
ALT-PU-2025-16606
ALT-PU-2025-16606: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.241-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-16600
ALT-PU-2025-16600: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.151-alt1
ALT-PU-2025-16510
ALT-PU-2025-16510: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.45-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-38721 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) { if (ct != last) nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); But this referen... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38721 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) { if (ct != last) nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); But this referen... | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38721 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) { | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38721 netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2025-38721 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: n ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
GHSA-6237-rh4h-82p6 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcount leak on table dump There is a reference count leak in ctnetlink_dump_table(): if (res < 0) { nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general); // HERE cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct; ... While its very unlikely, its possible that ct == last. If this happens, then the refcount of ct was already incremented. This 2nd increment is never undone. This prevents the conntrack object from being released, which in turn keeps prevents cnet->count from dropping back to 0. This will then block the netns dismantle (or conntrack rmmod) as nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() will wait forever. This can be reproduced by running conntrack_resize.sh selftest in a loop. It takes ~20 minutes for me on a preemptible kernel on average before I see a runaway kworker spinning in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list. One fix would to change this to: if (res < 0) ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
BDU:2025-15750 Уязвимость компонента nf_conntrack_netlink.c ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 1 года назад | |
ROS-20260407-80-0016 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад | |
ROS-20260407-73-0015 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад | |
SUSE-SU-2025:3725-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03601-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
ELSA-2025-20662 ELSA-2025-20662: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 года назад | |||
ELSA-2025-25757 ELSA-2025-25757: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 12 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2025-20663 ELSA-2025-20663: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03602-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2025:03633-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
ALT-PU-2025-16619 ALT-PU-2025-16619: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.241-alt1.rt135 | CVSS3: 8.1 | около 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-16606 ALT-PU-2025-16606: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.241-alt1 | CVSS3: 8.1 | около 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-16600 ALT-PU-2025-16600: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.151-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | около 1 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2025-16510 ALT-PU-2025-16510: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.45-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | около 1 года назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу