Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 35
Количество 35
CVE-2026-23103
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This should n...
CVE-2026-23103
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This should n...
CVE-2026-23103
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This sh
CVE-2026-23103
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i ...
GHSA-ghmm-m363-9645
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This...
BDU:2026-11576
Уязвимость компонентов ipvlan ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ROS-20260918-80-0131
Уязвимость kernel-lt
ROS-20260918-73-0115
Уязвимость kernel-lt
SUSE-SU-2026:1563-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:1606-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:1643-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
RLSA-2026:77689
Important: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update
ELSA-2026-77689
ELSA-2026-77689: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update (IMPORTANT)
RLSA-2026:77690
Important: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update
ELSA-2026-77690
ELSA-2026-77690: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update (IMPORTANT)
SUSE-SU-2026:1668-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
RLSA-2026:68531
Important: kernel security update
ELSA-2026-68531
ELSA-2026-68531: kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
SUSE-SU-2026:1661-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:1573-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2026-23103 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This should n... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2026-23103 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This should n... | CVSS3: 4.7 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2026-23103 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This sh | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2026-23103 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
GHSA-ghmm-m363-9645 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port Make the addrs_lock be per port, not per ipvlan dev. Initial code seems to be written in the assumption, that any address change must occur under RTNL. But it is not so for the case of IPv6. So 1) Introduce per-port addrs_lock. 2) It was needed to fix places where it was forgotten to take lock (ipvlan_open/ipvlan_close) This appears to be a very minor problem though. Since it's highly unlikely that ipvlan_add_addr() will be called on 2 CPU simultaneously. But nevertheless, this could cause: 1) False-negative of ipvlan_addr_busy(): one interface iterated through all port->ipvlans + ipvlan->addrs under some ipvlan spinlock, and another added IP under its own lock. Though this is only possible for IPv6, since looks like only ipvlan_addr6_event() can be called without rtnl_lock. 2) Race since ipvlan_ht_addr_add(port) is called under different ipvlan->addrs_lock locks This... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
BDU:2026-11576 Уязвимость компонентов ipvlan ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | 10 месяцев назад | |
ROS-20260918-80-0131 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | около 2 месяцев назад | |
ROS-20260918-73-0115 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | около 2 месяцев назад | |
SUSE-SU-2026:1563-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 7 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:1606-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 7 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:1643-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 6 месяцев назад | |||
RLSA-2026:77689 Important: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update | около 1 месяца назад | |||
ELSA-2026-77689 ELSA-2026-77689: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 месяца назад | |||
RLSA-2026:77690 Important: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update | около 1 месяца назад | |||
ELSA-2026-77690 ELSA-2026-77690: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update (IMPORTANT) | около 1 месяца назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:1668-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 6 месяцев назад | |||
RLSA-2026:68531 Important: kernel security update | около 2 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2026-68531 ELSA-2026-68531: kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 2 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:1661-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 6 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:1573-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 7 месяцев назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу