Количество 18
Количество 18
CVE-2026-43065
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since ...
CVE-2026-43065
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since ...
CVE-2026-43065
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), sin
CVE-2026-43065
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: e ...
ROS-20261009-80-0039
Уязвимость kernel-lt
ROS-20261009-73-0038
Уязвимость kernel-lt
GHSA-86wv-8x6p-4rhg
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), ...
openSUSE-SU-2026:20965-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:2591-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:2482-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ALT-PU-2026-6805
ALT-PU-2026-6805: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.168-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-6793
ALT-PU-2026-6793: package `kernel-image-6.18` update to version 6.18.22-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-7584
ALT-PU-2026-7584: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.86-alt1
ELSA-2026-50372
ELSA-2026-50372: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ALT-PU-2026-7350
ALT-PU-2026-7350: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.18.27-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-7006
ALT-PU-2026-7006: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.85-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-7004
ALT-PU-2026-7004: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.85-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-9924
ALT-PU-2026-9924: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2026-43065 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2026-43065 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2026-43065 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), sin | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2026-43065 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: e ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад | |
ROS-20261009-80-0039 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 18 дней назад | |
ROS-20261009-73-0038 Уязвимость kernel-lt | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 18 дней назад | |
GHSA-86wv-8x6p-4rhg In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | 6 месяцев назад | |
openSUSE-SU-2026:20965-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 4 месяца назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:2591-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 4 месяца назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:2482-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 4 месяца назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-6805 ALT-PU-2026-6805: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.168-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-6793 ALT-PU-2026-6793: package `kernel-image-6.18` update to version 6.18.22-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-7584 ALT-PU-2026-7584: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.86-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ELSA-2026-50372 ELSA-2026-50372: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 4 месяца назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-7350 ALT-PU-2026-7350: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.18.27-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-7006 ALT-PU-2026-7006: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.85-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-7004 ALT-PU-2026-7004: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.85-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-9924 ALT-PU-2026-9924: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.12.94-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 4 месяца назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу