Количество 35
Количество 35
GHSA-9cv8-8vgq-fg45
Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. ...

CVE-2024-10976
Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. A...

CVE-2024-10976
Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. ...

CVE-2024-10976
Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. An

CVE-2024-10976
CVE-2024-10976
Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a ...

BDU:2024-09684
Уязвимость политики безопасности таблиц с защитой строк CREATE POLICY системы управления базами данных PostgreSQL, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольные команды
ELSA-2024-10832
ELSA-2024-10832: postgresql:13 security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2024-10831
ELSA-2024-10831: postgresql:16 security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2024-10830
ELSA-2024-10830: postgresql:15 security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2024-10791
ELSA-2024-10791: postgresql security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2024-10788
ELSA-2024-10788: postgresql:16 security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2024-10787
ELSA-2024-10787: postgresql:15 security update (IMPORTANT)
ELSA-2024-10785
ELSA-2024-10785: postgresql:12 security update (IMPORTANT)

SUSE-SU-2025:01799-1
Security update for postgresql, postgresql16, postgresql17

SUSE-SU-2024:4176-1
Security update for postgresql14

SUSE-SU-2024:4175-1
Security update for postgresql13

SUSE-SU-2024:4174-1
Security update for postgresql15

SUSE-SU-2024:4173-1
Security update for postgresql, postgresql16, postgresql17

SUSE-SU-2024:4118-1
Security update for postgresql14
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GHSA-9cv8-8vgq-fg45 Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. ... | CVSS3: 4.2 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад | |
![]() | CVE-2024-10976 Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. A... | CVSS3: 4.2 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад |
![]() | CVE-2024-10976 Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. ... | CVSS3: 4.2 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад |
![]() | CVE-2024-10976 Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. An | CVSS3: 4.2 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад |
![]() | CVSS3: 5.4 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2024-10976 Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a ... | CVSS3: 4.2 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад | |
![]() | BDU:2024-09684 Уязвимость политики безопасности таблиц с защитой строк CREATE POLICY системы управления базами данных PostgreSQL, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольные команды | CVSS3: 4.2 | 0% Низкий | 7 месяцев назад |
ELSA-2024-10832 ELSA-2024-10832: postgresql:13 security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2024-10831 ELSA-2024-10831: postgresql:16 security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2024-10830 ELSA-2024-10830: postgresql:15 security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2024-10791 ELSA-2024-10791: postgresql security update (IMPORTANT) | 6 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2024-10788 ELSA-2024-10788: postgresql:16 security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2024-10787 ELSA-2024-10787: postgresql:15 security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
ELSA-2024-10785 ELSA-2024-10785: postgresql:12 security update (IMPORTANT) | 7 месяцев назад | |||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2025:01799-1 Security update for postgresql, postgresql16, postgresql17 | 16 дней назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:4176-1 Security update for postgresql14 | 7 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:4175-1 Security update for postgresql13 | 7 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:4174-1 Security update for postgresql15 | 7 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:4173-1 Security update for postgresql, postgresql16, postgresql17 | 7 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:4118-1 Security update for postgresql14 | 7 месяцев назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу