Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

Количество 13

Количество 13

github логотип

GHSA-hfpw-x3fg-wmmg

6 месяцев назад

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch dep...

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
ubuntu логотип

CVE-2025-12781

6 месяцев назад

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprecates ...

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
redhat логотип

CVE-2025-12781

6 месяцев назад

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprecates ...

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
nvd логотип

CVE-2025-12781

6 месяцев назад

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprec

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
debian логотип

CVE-2025-12781

6 месяцев назад

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsaf ...

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
fstec логотип

BDU:2026-05132

почти 2 года назад

Уязвимость модуля base64 интерпретатора языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
redos логотип

ROS-20260505-73-0069

3 месяца назад

Уязвимость python3.13

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
redos логотип

ROS-20260505-73-0068

3 месяца назад

Уязвимость python3.12

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
redos логотип

ROS-20260505-73-0067

3 месяца назад

Уязвимость python3.11

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
redos логотип

ROS-20260505-73-0066

3 месяца назад

Уязвимость python3.10

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
redos логотип

ROS-20260505-73-0065

3 месяца назад

Уязвимость python3

CVSS3: 5.3
EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2026:0767-1

5 месяцев назад

Security update for python311

EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2026:0693-1

5 месяцев назад

Security update for python311

EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
github логотип
GHSA-hfpw-x3fg-wmmg

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch dep...

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
6 месяцев назад
ubuntu логотип
CVE-2025-12781

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprecates ...

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
6 месяцев назад
redhat логотип
CVE-2025-12781

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprecates ...

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
6 месяцев назад
nvd логотип
CVE-2025-12781

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprec

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
6 месяцев назад
debian логотип
CVE-2025-12781

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsaf ...

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
6 месяцев назад
fstec логотип
BDU:2026-05132

Уязвимость модуля base64 интерпретатора языка программирования Python, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
почти 2 года назад
redos логотип
ROS-20260505-73-0069

Уязвимость python3.13

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
3 месяца назад
redos логотип
ROS-20260505-73-0068

Уязвимость python3.12

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
3 месяца назад
redos логотип
ROS-20260505-73-0067

Уязвимость python3.11

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
3 месяца назад
redos логотип
ROS-20260505-73-0066

Уязвимость python3.10

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
3 месяца назад
redos логотип
ROS-20260505-73-0065

Уязвимость python3

CVSS3: 5.3
1%
Низкий
3 месяца назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2026:0767-1

Security update for python311

5 месяцев назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2026:0693-1

Security update for python311

5 месяцев назад

Уязвимостей на страницу