Количество 18
Количество 18
GHSA-p594-vh26-gh4w
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the ...

CVE-2024-46695
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the add...

CVE-2024-46695
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the added ben...

CVE-2024-46695
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the add

CVE-2024-46695
CVE-2024-46695
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ...

BDU:2025-03392
Уязвимость компонентов selinux и smack ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ELSA-2024-10939
ELSA-2024-10939: kernel security update (MODERATE)

RLSA-2024:10943
Moderate: kernel security update
ELSA-2024-10943
ELSA-2024-10943: kernel security update (MODERATE)

SUSE-SU-2024:3585-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:3565-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

ROS-20250310-01
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt

SUSE-SU-2024:3553-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:3564-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:3561-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel

SUSE-SU-2024:3551-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ELSA-2024-12887
ELSA-2024-12887: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GHSA-p594-vh26-gh4w In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the ... | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
![]() | CVE-2024-46695 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the add... | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад |
![]() | CVE-2024-46695 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the added ben... | CVSS3: 6.3 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад |
![]() | CVE-2024-46695 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the add | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад |
![]() | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | 8 месяцев назад | |
CVE-2024-46695 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s ... | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад | |
![]() | BDU:2025-03392 Уязвимость компонентов selinux и smack ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 4.4 | 0% Низкий | 9 месяцев назад |
ELSA-2024-10939 ELSA-2024-10939: kernel security update (MODERATE) | 6 месяцев назад | |||
![]() | RLSA-2024:10943 Moderate: kernel security update | 6 месяцев назад | ||
ELSA-2024-10943 ELSA-2024-10943: kernel security update (MODERATE) | 6 месяцев назад | |||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:3585-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:3565-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | ROS-20250310-01 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 7.8 | 3 месяца назад | |
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:3553-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:3564-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:3561-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | ||
![]() | SUSE-SU-2024:3551-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 8 месяцев назад | ||
ELSA-2024-12887 ELSA-2024-12887: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | 6 месяцев назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу