Количество 14
Количество 14
GHSA-rf9w-458j-7pqc
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order.
CVE-2026-64305
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order.
CVE-2026-64305
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order.
CVE-2026-64305
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order.
CVE-2026-64305
crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock
CVE-2026-64305
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: c ...
ALT-PU-2026-12325
ALT-PU-2026-12325: package `kernel-image-for-vm` update to version 6.18.40-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-11249
ALT-PU-2026-11249: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.96-alt1
ALT-PU-2026-11606
ALT-PU-2026-11606: package `kernel-image-6.18` update to version 6.18.40-alt1
SUSE-SU-2026:4254-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2026:4120-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
ELSA-2026-500248
ELSA-2026-500248: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT)
ALT-PU-2026-11671
ALT-PU-2026-11671: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.98-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GHSA-rf9w-458j-7pqc In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order. | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | 3 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-64305 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order. | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | 3 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-64305 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order. | CVSS3: 7 | 0% Низкий | 3 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-64305 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock The service_table list is protected by service_lock when entries are added or removed (in adf_service_add() and adf_service_remove()), but several functions iterate over the list without holding this lock. A concurrent adf_service_register() or adf_service_unregister() call could modify the list during traversal, leading to list corruption or a use-after-free. Fix this by holding service_lock across all list_for_each_entry() iterations of service_table in adf_dev_init(), adf_dev_start(), adf_dev_stop(), adf_dev_shutdown(), adf_dev_restarting_notify(), adf_dev_restarted_notify(), and adf_error_notifier(). The lock ordering is safe: callers of the static helpers (adf_dev_up() and adf_dev_down()) acquire state_lock before service_lock, and no event_hld callback or service_lock holder ever acquires state_lock in the reverse order. | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | 3 месяца назад | |
CVE-2026-64305 crypto: qat - protect service table iterations with service_lock | 0% Низкий | 3 месяца назад | ||
CVE-2026-64305 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: c ... | CVSS3: 7.8 | 0% Низкий | 3 месяца назад | |
ALT-PU-2026-12325 ALT-PU-2026-12325: package `kernel-image-for-vm` update to version 6.18.40-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | 3 месяца назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-11249 ALT-PU-2026-11249: package `kernel-image-6.12` update to version 6.12.96-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 3 месяца назад | ||
ALT-PU-2026-11606 ALT-PU-2026-11606: package `kernel-image-6.18` update to version 6.18.40-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 3 месяца назад | ||
SUSE-SU-2026:4254-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 месяца назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2026:4120-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 2 месяцев назад | |||
openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 месяца назад | |||
ELSA-2026-500248 ELSA-2026-500248: Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update (IMPORTANT) | около 2 месяцев назад | |||
ALT-PU-2026-11671 ALT-PU-2026-11671: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.12.98-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | 3 месяца назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу