Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

Количество 3

Количество 3

nvd логотип

CVE-2013-2052

около 13 лет назад

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in libreswan 3.0 and 3.1, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.

CVSS2: 5.1
EPSS: Низкий
debian логотип

CVE-2013-2052

около 13 лет назад

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in libreswan 3.0 and 3.1, when O ...

CVSS2: 5.1
EPSS: Низкий
github логотип

GHSA-ghm6-8w78-2p3j

больше 4 лет назад

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in libreswan 3.0 and 3.1, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.

EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
nvd логотип
CVE-2013-2052

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in libreswan 3.0 and 3.1, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.

CVSS2: 5.1
2%
Низкий
около 13 лет назад
debian логотип
CVE-2013-2052

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in libreswan 3.0 and 3.1, when O ...

CVSS2: 5.1
2%
Низкий
около 13 лет назад
github логотип
GHSA-ghm6-8w78-2p3j

Buffer overflow in the atodn function in libreswan 3.0 and 3.1, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.

2%
Низкий
больше 4 лет назад

Уязвимостей на страницу