Логотип exploitDog
bind:CVE-2023-49957
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

bind:CVE-2023-49957

Количество 2

Количество 2

nvd логотип

CVE-2023-49957

около 2 лет назад

An issue was discovered in Dalmann OCPP.Core before 1.3.0 for OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) for electric vehicles. It permits multiple transactions with the same connectorId and idTag, contrary to the expected ConcurrentTx status. This could result in critical transaction management and billing errors. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is "Imagine you've got two cars in your family and want to charge both in parallel on the same account/token? Why should that be rejected?"

CVSS3: 7.5
EPSS: Низкий
github логотип

GHSA-2pjv-w5q5-2v83

около 2 лет назад

An issue was discovered in Dalmann OCPP.Core before 1.3.0 for OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) for electric vehicles. It permits multiple transactions with the same connectorId and idTag, contrary to the expected ConcurrentTx status. This could result in critical transaction management and billing errors. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is "Imagine you've got two cars in your family and want to charge both in parallel on the same account/token? Why should that be rejected?"

CVSS3: 7.5
EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
nvd логотип
CVE-2023-49957

An issue was discovered in Dalmann OCPP.Core before 1.3.0 for OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) for electric vehicles. It permits multiple transactions with the same connectorId and idTag, contrary to the expected ConcurrentTx status. This could result in critical transaction management and billing errors. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is "Imagine you've got two cars in your family and want to charge both in parallel on the same account/token? Why should that be rejected?"

CVSS3: 7.5
0%
Низкий
около 2 лет назад
github логотип
GHSA-2pjv-w5q5-2v83

An issue was discovered in Dalmann OCPP.Core before 1.3.0 for OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) for electric vehicles. It permits multiple transactions with the same connectorId and idTag, contrary to the expected ConcurrentTx status. This could result in critical transaction management and billing errors. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is "Imagine you've got two cars in your family and want to charge both in parallel on the same account/token? Why should that be rejected?"

CVSS3: 7.5
0%
Низкий
около 2 лет назад

Уязвимостей на страницу