Логотип exploitDog
bind:CVE-2023-53095
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

bind:CVE-2023-53095

Количество 7

Количество 7

ubuntu логотип

CVE-2023-53095

9 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
redhat логотип

CVE-2023-53095

9 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
nvd логотип

CVE-2023-53095

9 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
debian логотип

CVE-2023-53095

9 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: d ...

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
redos логотип

ROS-20260128-73-0060

12 дней назад

Уязвимость kernel-lt

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
github логотип

GHSA-qq4h-f4qp-wr7q

9 месяцев назад

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2025:02173-1

7 месяцев назад

Security update for the Linux Kernel

EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
ubuntu логотип
CVE-2023-53095

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
9 месяцев назад
redhat логотип
CVE-2023-53095

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
9 месяцев назад
nvd логотип
CVE-2023-53095

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
9 месяцев назад
debian логотип
CVE-2023-53095

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: d ...

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
9 месяцев назад
redos логотип
ROS-20260128-73-0060

Уязвимость kernel-lt

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
12 дней назад
github логотип
GHSA-qq4h-f4qp-wr7q

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Fix a NULL pointer dereference The LRU mechanism may look up a resource in the process of being removed from an object. The locking rules here are a bit unclear but it looks currently like res->bo assignment is protected by the LRU lock, whereas bo->resource is protected by the object lock, while *clearing* of bo->resource is also protected by the LRU lock. This means that if we check that bo->resource points to the LRU resource under the LRU lock we should be safe. So perform that check before deciding to swap out a bo. That avoids dereferencing a NULL bo->resource in ttm_bo_swapout().

CVSS3: 5.5
0%
Низкий
9 месяцев назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2025:02173-1

Security update for the Linux Kernel

7 месяцев назад

Уязвимостей на страницу