Логотип exploitDog
bind:CVE-2024-38365
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

bind:CVE-2024-38365

Количество 3

Количество 3

nvd логотип

CVE-2024-38365

10 месяцев назад

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go (golang). The btcd Bitcoin client (versions 0.10 to 0.24) did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can lead to btcd clients accepting an invalid Bitcoin block (or rejecting a valid one). This consensus failure can be leveraged to cause a chain split (accepting an invalid Bitcoin block) or be exploited to DoS the btcd nodes (rejecting a valid Bitcoin block). An attacker can create a standard transaction where FindAndDelete doesn't return a match but removeOpCodeByData does making btcd get a different sighash, leading to a chain split. Importantly, this vulnerability can be exploited remotely by any Bitcoin user and does not require any hash power. This is because the difference in behavior can be triggered by a "standard" Bitcoin transaction, that is a transaction which gets relayed through

CVSS3: 7.4
EPSS: Низкий
github логотип

GHSA-27vh-h6mc-q6g8

10 месяцев назад

btcd did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality

CVSS3: 7.4
EPSS: Низкий
suse-cvrf логотип

SUSE-SU-2024:3911-1

10 месяцев назад

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

EPSS: Низкий

Уязвимостей на страницу

Уязвимость
CVSS
EPSS
Опубликовано
nvd логотип
CVE-2024-38365

btcd is an alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go (golang). The btcd Bitcoin client (versions 0.10 to 0.24) did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality. This logic is consensus-critical: the difference in behavior with the other Bitcoin clients can lead to btcd clients accepting an invalid Bitcoin block (or rejecting a valid one). This consensus failure can be leveraged to cause a chain split (accepting an invalid Bitcoin block) or be exploited to DoS the btcd nodes (rejecting a valid Bitcoin block). An attacker can create a standard transaction where FindAndDelete doesn't return a match but removeOpCodeByData does making btcd get a different sighash, leading to a chain split. Importantly, this vulnerability can be exploited remotely by any Bitcoin user and does not require any hash power. This is because the difference in behavior can be triggered by a "standard" Bitcoin transaction, that is a transaction which gets relayed through

CVSS3: 7.4
0%
Низкий
10 месяцев назад
github логотип
GHSA-27vh-h6mc-q6g8

btcd did not correctly re-implement Bitcoin Core's "FindAndDelete()" functionality

CVSS3: 7.4
0%
Низкий
10 месяцев назад
suse-cvrf логотип
SUSE-SU-2024:3911-1

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

10 месяцев назад

Уязвимостей на страницу