Количество 12
Количество 12
CVE-2024-50060
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop.
CVE-2024-50060
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop.
CVE-2024-50060
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop.
CVE-2024-50060
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i ...
GHSA-pxgm-f458-hpx2
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop.
BDU:2025-07935
Уязвимость ядра операционной системы Linux, связанная с ошибками управления состоянием, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ELSA-2025-20518-0
ELSA-2025-20518-0: kernel security update (MODERATE)
RLSA-2025:20518
Moderate: kernel security update
SUSE-SU-2024:3986-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:3984-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:4387-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
SUSE-SU-2024:4318-1
Security update for the Linux Kernel
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-50060 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop. | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2024-50060 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop. | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2024-50060 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop. | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
CVE-2024-50060 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
GHSA-pxgm-f458-hpx2 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop. | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
BDU:2025-07935 Уязвимость ядра операционной системы Linux, связанная с ошибками управления состоянием, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | около 1 года назад | |
ELSA-2025-20518-0 ELSA-2025-20518-0: kernel security update (MODERATE) | 27 дней назад | |||
RLSA-2025:20518 Moderate: kernel security update | 22 дня назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:3986-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:3984-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:4387-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | 12 месяцев назад | |||
SUSE-SU-2024:4318-1 Security update for the Linux Kernel | около 1 года назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу