Логотип exploitDog
Консоль
Логотип exploitDog

exploitDog

altlinux логотип

ALT-PU-2024-16921

Критический

ALT-PU-2024-16921: package openssl1.1 update to version 1.1.1w-alt2

Источник
errata.altlinux.org
Дата публикации
13.12.2024
Дата обновления
04.02.2026
Устраненные уязвимости
12

ALT Linux branch p11
ALT Container
ALT Education
ALT Workstation
ALT Workstation K
ALT Server
ALT Virtualization PVE Edition

Описание

This update upgrades openssl1.1 to version 1.1.1w-alt2.

Устраненные уязвимости12

Связанные уязвимости

CVSS3: 9.1
altlinux
почти 2 года назад

ALT-PU-2024-16925: package `openssl1.1` update to version 1.1.1w-alt0.p10.2

CVSS3: 6.5
altlinux
почти 3 года назад

ALT-PU-2024-1746: package `openssl3` update to version 3.1.5-alt1

oracle-oval
больше 2 лет назад

ELSA-2024-2447: openssl and openssl-fips-provider security update (LOW)

CVSS3: 5.3
ubuntu
около 3 лет назад

Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained...

CVSS3: 5.3
redhat
около 3 лет назад

Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained...