Описание
Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.C...
| Релиз | Статус | Примечание |
|---|---|---|
| devel | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps-legacy/xenial | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps/bionic | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps/focal | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps/jammy | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps/noble | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps/resolute | needs-triage | |
| esm-apps/xenial | ignored | end of ESM support, was needs-triage |
| esm-infra-legacy/trusty | needs-triage | |
| jammy | needs-triage |
Показывать по
EPSS
6.5 Medium
CVSS3
Связанные уязвимости
Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.C...
Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.sprin
Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions ...
Spring Framework vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD)
Уязвимость фреймворка Spring Framework, связанная с непринятием мер по обработке последовательностей CRLF в заголовках HTTP Headers (или \"Расщепление ответа HTTP\"), позволяющая нарушителю провести атаку RFD
EPSS
6.5 Medium
CVSS3