Поиск уязвимостей
Количество 17
Количество 17
CVE-2023-52828
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar(cond): if ...
CVE-2023-52828
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar(cond): if ...
CVE-2023-52828
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar
CVE-2023-52828
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ...
GHSA-6j2j-fwgf-fcf6
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit ...
BDU:2024-10414
Уязвимость компонента bpf ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
ROS-20241120-02
Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt
ALT-PU-2023-8282
ALT-PU-2023-8282: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.204-alt1.rt100
ALT-PU-2023-8823
ALT-PU-2023-8823: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.64-alt1
ALT-PU-2023-7921
ALT-PU-2023-7921: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.203-alt1
ALT-PU-2023-8577
ALT-PU-2023-8577: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.65-alt1
ALT-PU-2023-8892
ALT-PU-2023-8892: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.5.13-alt1
ALT-PU-2023-8700
ALT-PU-2023-8700: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.6.3-alt1
ALT-PU-2023-7838
ALT-PU-2023-7838: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 6.6.4-alt1
ALT-PU-2023-7750
ALT-PU-2023-7750: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.1.64-alt1.rt17
ALT-PU-2024-4843
ALT-PU-2024-4843: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.1.77-alt1
ALT-PU-2024-4263
ALT-PU-2024-4263: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.1.77-alt1
Уязвимостей на страницу
Уязвимость | CVSS | EPSS | Опубликовано | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-52828 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar(cond): if ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2023-52828 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar(cond): if ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2023-52828 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
CVE-2023-52828 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: b ... | CVSS3: 5.5 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
GHSA-6j2j-fwgf-fcf6 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit ... | CVSS3: 6.6 | 0% Низкий | больше 2 лет назад | |
BDU:2024-10414 Уязвимость компонента bpf ядра операционной системы Linux, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании | CVSS3: 6.6 | 0% Низкий | около 3 лет назад | |
ROS-20241120-02 Множественные уязвимости kernel-lt | CVSS3: 8.8 | почти 2 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-8282 ALT-PU-2023-8282: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 5.10.204-alt1.rt100 | CVSS3: 9.1 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-8823 ALT-PU-2023-8823: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 6.1.64-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-7921 ALT-PU-2023-7921: package `kernel-image-std-def` update to version 5.10.203-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.1 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-8577 ALT-PU-2023-8577: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.1.65-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-8892 ALT-PU-2023-8892: package `kernel-image-un-def` update to version 6.5.13-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-8700 ALT-PU-2023-8700: package `kernel-image-pine` update to version 6.6.3-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-7838 ALT-PU-2023-7838: package `kernel-image-mp` update to version 6.6.4-alt1 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2023-7750 ALT-PU-2023-7750: package `kernel-image-rt` update to version 6.1.64-alt1.rt17 | CVSS3: 9.8 | почти 3 года назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-4843 ALT-PU-2024-4843: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.1.77-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | больше 2 лет назад | ||
ALT-PU-2024-4263 ALT-PU-2024-4263: package `kernel-image-rpi-un` update to version 6.1.77-alt1 | CVSS3: 10 | больше 2 лет назад |
Уязвимостей на страницу